Preparation (43 pages):

• Christof Heyns, David Padilla & Leo Zwaak,A schematic comparison of regional human rights systems: an update, (2006) 4 SUR – Int’l J. Hum. Rts 163-171
• Proceedings of the Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights Issue 3 – Evidence, March 31, 2003
• A Roadmap for an ASEAN Human Rights Mechanism, Prepared by Professor Vitit Muntarbhorn, co-chairperson of the Working Group, at the third workshop for an ASEAN Regional Mechanism on Human Rights, Bangkok, Thailand from 28 – 29 May 2003
• Thomas Fuller, “Asean Inaugurates Human Rights Commission,” The New York Times, October 24, 2009, sec. International / Asia Pacific
• Harvard Law School, In a major new study, recommendations for reforming the way human rights courts work,
• Scott Lyon, The African Court on Human and Peoples Rights‘, ASIL Insights, September 19, 2006, Volume 10, Issue 24
• The future of the Strasbourg Court and enforcement of ECHR standards: reflections on the Interlaken process, Conclusions of the Chairperson, Mrs Herta Däubler-Gmelin, of the hearing held in Paris on 16 December 2009
• “Marcel Berlins on reforming the European court of human rights in Strasbourg | Comment is free | The Guardian,” April 6, 2009.

Further readings:

• Human Rights Herald, January 2010
• George Mukundi Wachira, African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: Ten years on and still no justice, Minority Groups International (2008)
• C. G. Hioureas, “Behind the Scenes of Protocol No. 14: Politics in Reforming the European Court of Human Rights,” Berkeley J. Int’l L. 24 (2006): 718
• J. L. Cavallaro and S. E. Brewer, “Reevaluating Regional Human Rights Litigation in the Twenty-First Century: The Case of the Inter-American Court,” Am. J. Int’l L. 102 (2008): 768
• J. Kahn, “Russian Compliance with Articles Five and Six of the European Convention of Human Rights as a Barometer of Legal Reform and Human Rights in Russia,” U. Mich. JL Reform 35 (2001): 641